Paper
27 January 2023 Comparison between optical markers and physical markers-assisted panoramic 3D measurement
Yang Zhao, Yucheng Zheng, Haotian Yu, Yi Zhang, Jing Han, Dongliang Zheng
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 12550, International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2022); 1255007 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2666681
Event: International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2022), 2022, ONLINE, China
Abstract
Panoramic 3D measurement becomes increasingly important for fringe projection profilometry (FPP). Traditional physical markers-assisted (PMA) method suffers from inefficiencies and non-complete measurement. An optical markers-assisted (OMA) panoramic 3D method has been recently proposed, which enables accurate, efficient and non-destructive panoramic 3D measurement. In this paper, we give a comprehensive comparison between OMA and PMA, which provides reasonable suggestions for different panoramic 3D measurement applications.
© (2023) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Yang Zhao, Yucheng Zheng, Haotian Yu, Yi Zhang, Jing Han, and Dongliang Zheng "Comparison between optical markers and physical markers-assisted panoramic 3D measurement", Proc. SPIE 12550, International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2022), 1255007 (27 January 2023); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2666681
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
3D metrology

Panoramic photography

Point clouds

Image registration

Nondestructive evaluation

3D acquisition

Back to Top