|
1.INTRODUCTIONUnder the current situation of rapid development of the national economy and the record high amount of electric energy, the safety and stability of power supply have higher standards. The traditional mode of manual inspection of transmission lines exposes problems such as low efficiency and difficulty in ensuring the safety and security of personnel. Therefore, the development of power inspection to automation and intelligence is an inevitable trend 1. UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) mainly combine infrared technology sensing technology, remote sensing technology and other high-tech performance of the flying aircraft, can observe some areas with relatively high hazard factors or areas with relatively complex situations, and use the high-tech performance carried by them for picture analysis and shooting 2.
The key technologies of autonomous inspection of UAV power lines include
This paper studies the trajectory planning technology of autonomous patrol of UAV power lines. Airports, temporary take-off and landing points, military management areas, party and government organs, supervision sites, observatories, satellite ground stations, meteorological radar stations, large enterprises that produce and store inflammable and explosive dangerous goods, large warehouses, bases, power plants, substations, gas stations and large stations, wharves, ports, large-scale event sites, high-speed railways, ordinary railways and other areas have no-fly zones 10. Meanwhile, thanks to the limited UAV computing power, consider that the UAV will unload the computing tasks to the ground station that passes by to calculate, and the ground station returns the calculation results to the UAV before the UAV flies away 11-12. Therefore, the UAV can bypass the no-fly zone and complete the calculation task before reaching the end point, so as to plan the UAV power line autonomous patrol track as a constraint. 2.SYSTEM MODELWhen the UAV completes the circuit inspection and photography task, it collects a heap of data, and the energy and computing resources carried by it cannot guarantee the completion of the computing task in a limited time, affecting the timeliness of the application 13. The UAV passes through a ground station with more computing power during the flight to the end point, and the UAV can offload data to the ground station to help it complete the calculation. In this process, the flight starting point and the finish point are fixed, the time for mission completion is limited, and it is constrained by factors such as flight speed, acceleration, and radius of curvature 14. This paper studies the UAV to complete the unloading of computational data within a specified time while minimizing the sum of its communication and flight energy consumption. The system’s model can be seen in Figure 1. Including a UAV and K ground stations. The UAV acts as one mobile data node, offloading all the data to the ground station. Suppose the UAV needs to finish calculating all its data as a task within a given time period T. In the UAV continuous flight, the trajectory can generate many numbers of continuous variables. Under this circumstance, it is hard to solve those infinite variables. Hence, the UAV trajectory is discretized. Time period T can be divided to serval equally time slots N, each with a length of δt. Formula (1) is used to calculate the value δt, The trajectory of the UAV is modelled as a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, where the XYZ axis is in meters. Then the coordinates qu[n] of the UAV in the n-th time slot can be expressed as H is the UAV flight hight on Z-axis, which remains unchanged during flight. xu[n] is the X-axis coordinates of the UAV in the No. n-th time slot. yu[n] is the Y-axis coordinates of the UAV in the No. n-th time slot. For the UAV, the location of all K ground stations are known in advance. The location coordinates of the k-th ground station are expressed as The X-axis coordinate of the k-th ground station is is expressed as xk, and the Y-axis coordinate is yk. The objective of this paper is to optimize the UVA flight energy consumption and communication energy consumption. The premise is to ensure that the UAV can complete the data offloading and calculation tasks within a specified time T, and then minimize the flight energy consumption and communication energy consumption. The optimization problem P0 is defined as follows 15 : The formula (4) indicates minimize the flight power consumption sum and communication energy consumption of the UAV. Where, c1 and c2 represent constants related to load coefficient, wing span efficiency, and wing area, the gravitational acceleration is given by g. The flight energy consumption of UAV is bound up with its speed and acceleration. When || v[n]||= 0, the UVA flight energy consumption is infinite. Therefore, fixed wing UAVs are different from rotary wing UAV, it cannot hover at a speed of 0 and must always fly in the air. Q represents the flight path of the UAV, Q={qu[1],…, qu[n],…, qu[N]}. Q represents the flight path of the UAV, Q={qu[1],…, qu[n],…, qu[N]}. P represents the transmit power vector set of each time slot, P={Pu[1],…, Pu[n],…, Pu[N]}, Pu[n]= {Pu,1[n],…, Pu,k[n],…, Pu,K[N]}. The formula (5) indicates the change in the trajectory of the UAV. v[n] = [vx[n],vy[n]], a[n] = [ax[n], ay[n]] represents both speed and acceleration at the n-th time slot, severally. vx[n] and vy[n] are the flight speeds of UAV on X and Y axis at the n-th time slot severally. The The acceleration of the UAV on the X and Y axes at the n-th time slot is expressed as ax[n] and ay[n]. The formula (6) indicates the speed change of the UAV during flight, maintaining a uniform acceleration movement between adjacent two time slots. The formula (7) indicates the maximum speed constraint of the UAV during flight, where Vmax as the flight speed maximum. The formula (8) indicates the maximum acceleration constraint of UAV during flight. amax is the maximum acceleration of UAV. The formula (9), coordinates of the specified start and finish locations of the UAV are q0 and qF. The formula (10) represents the trajectory constraint. Assuming that NNF is the number of the no-fly zones, the set of the no-fly zones will represented as {1, · · ·, NNF}. For ease of calculation, the No. j-th no-fly zone is modelled as cylinders with a center on the ground as {xNFj, yNFj }, a height of HNFj and a radius of QNFj, j ∈ {1, · · ·, NNF}. Based on the existence of the No. j-th no-fly zone, the distance between the center of it and the UVA during flight must always be larger than its radius QNFj. The formula (11) represents the minimum radius in curvature constraint, that is, the arc formed by the flight turn of the UAV will be limited by its own flight performance, and the UAV can only turn within a specific turning radius. Rmin is the minimum turning radius of UAV. The formula (12) represents the constraints on UAV transmitting power, and in the n-th time slot, the UAV transmit power for data transmission to the k-th ground station is expressed as Pu,k [n]. Pmax is the maximum transmitting power of UAV. The formula (13) indicates that to ensure the UAV can successfully complete the data offloading and calculation task under a given time, the sum total of data volume of the UAV unloaded to all ground stations during the entire time period must be greater than or equal to Ltotal. Ltotal indicates the sum amount of data that the UAV needs to unload. B means the bandwidth of communication channel in Hz. From the n-th time slot to the k-th ground station, the UVA channel power gain can be expressed as dk,n suggests the distance between the n-th time slot UAV and the k-th ground station. β0 indicates the channel gain at one meter distance. 3.SIMULATION RESULTS AND ANALYSISThe comparison of UAV flight trajectory using Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) unloading data and UAV flight trajectory using Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) unloading data is shown in Figure 2. For ease of observation, the location of the ground station is marked with a five-pointed star. As can be seen from Figure 2, in code-division multiple access mode, the UAV is able to complete the task with a smaller trajectory offset. This is also due to the use of spread spectrum in the code division multiple access mode, which can realize that multiple ground stations can receive data at the same time in the entire time period, without too much shortening the ground station distance and improving the channel gain. It should be noted that in the code division multiple access mode, the UAV trajectory is biased to the ground station less, its trajectory length is shorter, the average speed is smaller. And in the model of the UAV flight power consumption here, the UAV flight power consumption is also large and small than the time-division multiple access scheme. 4.CONCLUSIONThe simulation results of this paper display that the design scheme can effectively lower the power consumption of UAV during task execution, and the joint optimization algorithm used in the experiment has the best effect. In order to make the optimized result more in line with the authentic flight scenario of UAV, and different from the existing work to consider the simple flight model and flight scenario, this paper adds the design of the UAV no-fly zone and the minimum flight curvature radius, and the experiments show that the scheme proposed in this paper can get a more practical flight scheme that meets the conditions. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis research was financially supported by Major research project of Beijing Polytechnic (Performance optimization design and application of UAV inspection technology, No.2023X022-KXZ). REFERENCESYuan, J.,
“Application of UAV in High Voltage Transmission Line Inspection,”
Journal of Electronic Technology, 56
(6), 154
–155
(2022). Google Scholar
Ullah, Z., Al-Turjman, F., and Mostarda, L.,
“Cognition in UAV-aided 5G and beyond communications: A survey,”
IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw, 6
(3), 872
–891
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.6687307 Google Scholar
Xu, Q., Guo, C., Liu, Z., Ma, Y., Pan, Z., Li, J.,
“Autonomous inspection method of UAV transmission line based on dynamic trajectory planning,”
in Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Universities for Electric Power System and Automation,
24
–31
(2022). Google Scholar
Liu, C., Ma, X., Zheng, Y., et al.,
“Application of UAV in power transmission line inspection based on 5G technology,”
Electric Power Information and Communication, 19
(4), 44
–49
(2021). Google Scholar
Zheng, T., Sun, L., Lou, T., et al.,
“Determination method of safe flight area for UAV inspection for transmission line based on the electromagnetic field calculation,”
Shandong Electric Power, 45
(2), 27
–30
(2018). Google Scholar
Xiong, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., et al.,
“Joint optimization of trajectory, task offloading and CPU control in UAV-assisted wireless powered fog computing networks,”
IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., 1833
–1845
(2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGCN.2022.3157735 Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Xiong, K., Lu, Y., et al.,
“UAV-aided wireless power transfer and data collection in Rician fading,”
IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 39 3097
–3113
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2021.3088693 Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Lei, J., Liu, Y., et al.,
“Trajectory optimization for UAV emergency communication with limited user equipment energy: A safe-DQN approach,”
IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw, 1236
–1247
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGCN.2021.3068333 Google Scholar
Liu, L., Xiong, K., Cao, J., et al.,
“Average AoI minimization in UAV-assisted data collection with RF wireless power transfer: A deep reinforcement learning scheme,”
IEEE Internet Things J., 9 5216
–5228
(2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3110138 Google Scholar
Liu, H., Liu, X., Huang, J., Li, D.,
“Trajectory planning for a UAV relay communication system with no-fly zones using cooperative space time block coding,”
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0351 Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Xiong, K., Ni, Q., et al.,
“UAV-assisted wireless powered cooperative mobile edge computing: Joint offloading, CPU control, and trajectory optimization,”
IEEE Internet Things J., 7
(4), 2777
–2790
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIoT.6488907 Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhou, L., Zhou, F., et al.,
“Computation-Efficient Offloading and Trajectory Scheduling for Multi-UAV Assisted Mobile Edge Computing,”
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69
(2), 2114
–2125
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.25 Google Scholar
Qin, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., et al.,
“The UAV Trajectory Optimization for Data Collection from Time-Constrained IoT Devices: A Hierarchical Deep Q-Network Approach,”
Appl. Sci., 12 2546
(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052546 Google Scholar
Peng, X., Yi, L., Qian, J., et al.,
“Practical research on patrol inspection system of electric power line based on large scale unmanned helicopter,”
High Voltage Engineering, 46
(2), 384
–396
(2020). Google Scholar
Zeng, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, R.,
“Energy Minimization for Wireless Communication With Rotary-Wing UAV,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun, 18 2329
–2345
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.7693 Google Scholar
|