Presentation + Paper
7 October 2024 Illumination power requirements for an MCT APD vs. a COTS camera at 1.645um
Joshua Follansbee, Kayla Frye, Nicholas Hui, Casey Clark, Ronald Driggers, Matthew Kalensky
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Active imaging techniques can provide increased signal-to-noise ratio over passive imaging approaches, particularly in the reflective infrared bands (NIR, SWIR, and eSWIR) where passive solar illumination is reduced relative to the visible band. However, providing sufficient illuminator power at long range can introduce severe SWaP tradeoffs for system designers, as the strength of the illumination for a resolved laser spot scales proportionally to the inverse square of the illuminator-to-target distance. Active systems must therefore use illuminator photons efficiently. Avalanche photodiodes (APDs) offer high gain in the electronic domain, allowing the detection of a small number of photons by boosting the signal above the floor imposed by read noise. We compare the contrast-to-noise ratio performance of a mercury-cadmium-telluride (MCT) APD camera and a COTS InGaAs SWIR camera with an illuminator at 1.645[um] as a function of illuminator power. Factors affecting performance are discussed.
Conference Presentation
© (2024) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Joshua Follansbee, Kayla Frye, Nicholas Hui, Casey Clark, Ronald Driggers, and Matthew Kalensky "Illumination power requirements for an MCT APD vs. a COTS camera at 1.645um", Proc. SPIE 13149, Unconventional Imaging, Sensing, and Adaptive Optics 2024, 1314909 (7 October 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3027363
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Cameras

Avalanche photodetectors

Sensors

Nonuniformity corrections

Commercial off the shelf technology

Signal to noise ratio

Light sources and illumination

Back to Top