A theoretical investigation of several methods for combining multiple diagnostic assessments

Bei Liu; Charles E. Metz; Yulei Jiang

doi:10.1117/12.595826

6 April 2005 A theoretical investigation of several methods for combining multiple diagnostic assessments

Bei Liu, Charles E. Metz, Yulei Jiang

Proceedings Volume 5749, Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.595826
Event: Medical Imaging, 2005, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Acquiring multiple images of the same patient (e.g., mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal view mammograms) can, in principle, help improve diagnostic accuracy. We investigated theoretically, in the context of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), four methods of combining multiple computer outputs obtained from multiple images of the same patient: taking the average, the median, the maximum, or the minimum of the individual assessments. We assumed that multiple computer outputs for each patient are equally accurate and that they can be transformed monotonically to the same pair of truth conditional normal distributions. We found that both the average and the median always produce improved area under the ROC curve (AUC) compared to single-view images, and that the average always performs better than the median. Furthermore, the maximum and the minimum can also produce improved AUCs and can outperform the average under certain situations, but in other situations they can produce worse results than single-view images. Moreover, except for the median, each method can be the best-performing method under specific conditions. Finally, as the strength of correlation between image pairs increases, the maximum and the minimum tend to perform the best more often whereas the average is less often the best performer.

Citation Download Citation

Bei Liu, Charles E. Metz, and Yulei Jiang "A theoretical investigation of several methods for combining multiple diagnostic assessments", Proc. SPIE 5749, Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (6 April 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.595826

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Diagnostics

Electronic filtering

Computer aided diagnosis and therapy

Mammography

Statistical analysis

Data modeling

Performance modeling

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years