Mr. Kyle Stephens Profile

Kyle Stephens

Payload Integration Engineer

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Websites:

Personal Website

Publications (4)

Proceedings Article | 15 October 2012 Paper

Comparison of collection and land use efficiency for various solar concentrating field geometries

Kyle Stephens, J. Roger Angel

Proceedings Volume 8468, 846804 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.930240

KEYWORDS: Solar energy, Solar radiation models, Data modeling, Brain-machine interfaces, Sun, Photovoltaics, Atmospheric modeling, Mathematical modeling, Absorption, Solar cells

Read Abstract +

In this paper we analyze the effects of neighbor shadowing of tracking solar photovoltaic arrays when they are set out in solar farms for large scale generation. Closer tracker spacing yields more power per unit area of land, but less power per tracking unit because of shadowing. A model has been developed to quantify and compare efficiencies for different tracker aspect ratios and field layouts, on an hourly, daily and annual basis. The model accounts for atmospheric absorption as well as neighbor shadowing at low solar altitude angles. We have focused on the case of CPV arrays which are oriented normal to the rays from the sun. The field layout is best characterized by the ratio of total array area to land area (the ground cover ratio or GCR). We explore as a function of GCR both the fraction of all the direct sunlight energy that is intercepted by the arrays (the irradiance collection efficiency) and the energy lost by each array because of shadowing.Examples are worked out for rectangular arrays on dual axis trackers at 33° latitude. We find that for a ground cover ratio of 30% the annual irradiance collection efficiency is 50%, almost independent of the layout pattern or the array aspect ratio. For a ground cover ratio of 40%, the irradiance collection efficiency rises to 65%. The corresponding shadowing losses do depend on aspect ratio, thus for 30% GCR the annual average of shadowing loss is 7.2% for 3:1 aspect ratio, rising to 7.8% for 2:1 aspect ratio. High GCR is not realizable for higher aspect ratios, which lead to large swing radius, but for 2:1 aspect ratio 40% GCR results in shadowing loss of 11.5%. One conclusion is that a solar farm with arrays of 2:1 aspect ratio set out with 40% GCR is good compromise when land is scarce: 64% of all the direct sunlight energy incident on the land is harvested by the arrays, with only 11.5% shadowing loss. We have compared these efficiencies with those for trough CSP systems, which also harvest direct sunlight but with reflectors turning about a single, horizontal N-S axis. For given GCR, the shadowing loss is slightly less (0.5%) than for the above dual-axis arrays, however the irradiance collection efficiency is worse in winter, leading to a lower annual average for a given GCR. For example, at 40% GCR, a single-axis system realizes a 56% irradiance collection efficiency compared to 64% for the dual axis systems.

Proceedings Article | 13 September 2012 Paper

Analysis of gravitational effects on liquid lenses (ANGEL)

Kevin Newman, Kyle Stephens

Proceedings Volume 8450, 84500G (2012) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926520

KEYWORDS: Liquid lenses, Liquids, Microfluidics, Interfaces, Lens design, Wavefronts, LCDs, Microfluidic imaging, Metrology, CCD cameras

Read Abstract +

SPIE Journal Paper | 1 July 2010 Open Access

Single-variable parametric cost models for space telescopes

H. Philip Stahl, Kyle Stephens, Todd Henrichs, Christian Smart, Frank Prince

OE, Vol. 49, Issue 07, 073006, (July 2010) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.10.1117/1.3456582

KEYWORDS: Space telescopes, James Webb Space Telescope, Telescopes, Data modeling, Mirrors, Databases, Space operations, Optical engineering, Observatories, Statistical modeling

Read Abstract +

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Proceedings Article | 26 August 2009 Paper

Preliminary cost model for space telescopes

H. Philip Stahl, Frank Prince, Christian Smart, Kyle Stephens, Todd Henrichs

Proceedings Volume 7436, 743602 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.826750

KEYWORDS: Space telescopes, Telescopes, Data modeling, Mirrors, Systems modeling, James Webb Space Telescope, Optical telescopes, Infrared telescopes, Statistical analysis, Infrared sensors

Read Abstract +

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years