Paper
1 February 1975 Discussion Following Panelists' Opening Remarks Session IV
Gray, Capp, Wagner, Goodenough, Rao
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 0047, Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine III; (1975) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.954044
Event: Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine III, 1974, Kansas City, United States
Abstract
DuPont Cronex 4 film is approxi-mately half the speed of Kodak RPR film, and requires twice the number of photons to make an exposure. Consequently, quan-tum mottle should be less with Cronex 4 film, at least if the same screens are used with both films, as in our study. However, do you feel it is valid to compare a high speed screen system to another system which uses medium speed screens?
© (1975) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Gray, Capp, Wagner, Goodenough, and Rao "Discussion Following Panelists' Opening Remarks Session IV", Proc. SPIE 0047, Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine III, (1 February 1975); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.954044
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photons

Image processing

Modulation transfer functions

Image intensifiers

Chest

Interference (communication)

Radiography

RELATED CONTENT

Noise Sources In Digital Fluorography
Proceedings of SPIE (November 04 1981)
Image Transfer Characteristics Of Image Intensifier Tubes
Proceedings of SPIE (April 16 1973)
Visual Processing Of Repetitive Images
Proceedings of SPIE (July 09 1976)
Simulated intensified images
Proceedings of SPIE (October 11 2005)

Back to Top