|
1.INTRODUCTIONIn Europe, the in-orbit success of the SILEX (Satellite Interlink EXperiment) program has demonstrated the feasibility to establish long distance optical links between a LEO remote sensing satellite, namely SPOT4 and a GEO relay spacecraft ARTEMIS. Urgent images taken far away from Europe can be sent in real time to processing centres. Europe has continued to invest in optical communication technologies. The European Space Agency has promoted several Optical Intersatellite Link technology developments. The DLR is funding the LCT program (Laser Communication Terminal) to be flown on board the Terrasar satellite. The European Community is supporting the Campanina project to develop High Altitude Platforms inter-connected with optical links. End 2003, the decision of the French MOD to initiate the LOLA program opens new perspectives for free space optical communications through the atmosphere. Flight tests are about to start. 2.LOLA PROGRAMME OBJECTIVESLOLA stands for Liaison Optique Laser Aéroportée (Airborne Atmospheric Laser Link). The main objective of this prospective program is to characterise the performance of an optical link between an airborne demonstrator and the ARTEMIS geostationary existing spacecraft (cf. fig.1.) Some specificities of the aircraft environment and of the atmosphere are a clear challenge for the establishment of the link. The airborne dynamic perturbations are about ten times more stringent than on a satellite. The atmosphere affects significantly the propagation of the light not only in terms of transmission but also in terms of direction of propagation and wavefront error of the beam. The ultimate goal of this programme is not only to demonstrate the feasibility of such links but also to determine its operational availability for unmanned aerial vehicles or high altitude platforms. 3.LOLA OPTICAL TERMINAL ARCHITECTUREThe LOLA optical terminal features an aerial part and deported communication and control electronics The aerial part includes a coudé telescope mounted on top of a bi-axis wide angular mechanism and a focal plane that combines the optical receive and transmit paths. The receive beam is split between the acquisition & tracking path and the communication receive channel. An inertial measurement unit provides the reference axes during the open loop phase(Cf. Fig.2) The laser Rx and Tx communication electronics modulates the laser diode with the 50 Mbits/s transmit digital signal and demodulates the 2 Mbits/s receive optical signal. The terminal control electronics ensures the management of the Pointing Acquisition and Tracking sub-system. Various metrology equipment ensure the proper monitoring of the environment as well as the performance of the terminal (TEB, timings…). Requirements & expected performance are provided Fig.3 and Fig.4.) 4.TERMINAL OPTOMECANICAL CONFIGURATIONThe selected aerial design is a Coudé off axis telescope. The optical beam is folded through the azimuth and elevation articulations. The focal plane is located beneath the azimuth elevation motor. This design enables to point the optical beam over a 2π steradiant angular range. It minimises the mobile mass and the optical straylight can be baffled easily. (Cf. Fig 5) Pointing stabilityWhen pointing requirements below 1 µrad are required, thermoelastic stability becomes a clear design driver for the opto-mechanical architecture. The telescope and the focal plane are thus made out of stiff and stable silicon carbide material (cf.Fig.6 & Fig.7). Solar flux entrance has been reduced thanks to specific thermal shield on the telescope and a rejection filter on the optical window. The overall terminal is installed inside a thermal enclosure and the focal plane itself is protected by a specific thermal hood; Finally, optical fibres enable to move away from the optical head, dissipative elements, like the laser diodes or the communication receiver. 5.POINTING ACQUISITION AND TRACKINGRejection of the dynamic perturbations and the distortion of the optical beam through the atmosphere has been a major design driver of the pointing acquisition and tracking subsystem. The low frequency reference attitude and position is provided by a gyro-stabilised inertial central unit coupled to a GPS information sensor. The bandwidths of the tracking control loops have been increased significantly up compared to SILEX (capability up to several hundred Hz). Mechanical dampers filter the high frequency content of the dynamic perturbations. (Cf.Fig.8) The wide angular mechanism combines a full hemispherical range with high bandwidth (50 Hz) and high accuracy pointing capabilities (few tenth of µrad). This mechanism is therefore able to perform the whole acquisition by steering the telescope, from accurate open-loop pointing to fast GEO beacon spot centring into the small tracking window. This allows to simplify the acquisition sequence and to largely relax the range requirements on the fine pointing mechanism while maintaining fast acquisition duration (about 10s). The wide angular mechanism uses a brushless DC torque motor with low friction ball-bearing guiding and high resolution optical encoder. Another innovation introduced in the LOLA PAT system is the Acquisition & Tracking Sensor combining three functions:
Such a multi-function sensor is made possible by the flexible windowing offered by Active Pixel Sensor technology, which allows rapid switching from full-frame readout to high frequency acquisition of a small window at any position in the matrix. The LOLA sensor is a 750x750 pixel CMOS matrix with 8 Mpixel/s readout rate. 6.COMMUNICATION CHAINThe communication chain is compatible with ARTEMIS up and down links: ie 2Mb/s BPPM forward link and the 50 Mbits/s OOK downlink. This 0.8µm flight proven technology is based on PM fibered single mode laser diode components and Slick APD avalanche photodiodes. Fibre Bragg grating is used to stabilize the emitted optical spectrum down to 1 nm. (Cf. Fig.9). The laser communication unit includes a single stage current driver for the Tx laser diode and a Rx photodiode an with integrated pre-amplifier. (Cf.Fig10) The atmosphere is a fading propagation channel for optical beams. To increase the robustness of the transmission to potential error bursts a specific coding of the data stream is implemented. The LOLA communication chain features scrambling, bit integrity framing, frame interleaving, and DVBS2 error correcting code. (Cf.Fig.11). It provides quasi error free transmission despite the disturbances of the propagation channel. 7.LINK MODELThe optical link model has been developed to assess the performance of the link through the atmosphere and to establish the link availability over the world and the year. It has enabled to confirm during the design phase the design of the LOLA optical terminal and will be used for test predictions during the flight test campaign. This model This model includes (Cf.Fig.12)
This model provides a time x frequency (> 2500 Hz) domain simulation that combines the contributions of each parameters. The output is the received beam in the time domain. Fig.13 depicts the upward propagation of the wavefront error of the Gaussian beam from the aircraft towards the satellite. This model has been correlated with optical link measurements performed thanks to the European Space Agency between ARTEMIS and the Optical Ground Station in Teide (Canarian Islands). A very good match between test results and performance predictions has been achieved (Cf.Fig.14). 8.LINK PERFORMANCEThe link performance have been first established for reference conditions (An airplane altitude of 20.000 ft, a fairly turbulent atmosphere (2 sigma value) corresponding to an average altitude wind of 27 m/s, a cirrus thickness of 1 km, a 15° sun aspect angle, as well as typical pointing performance of both LOLA and ARTEMIS optical terminals). (Cf.Fig.15) A sensitivity analysis on the main link parameters has then been performed to assess the robustness of the performance to various conditions. As anticipated, the uplink performance is more sensitive to parameters fluctuation. On the down link the turbulences create mainly scintillation of the incoming signal whereas for the uplink the atmosphere affects the wave front error of the uplink Gaussian beam causing not only scintillation but also an erratic fluctuation of the direction and shape of the emitted pattern. This is the well known “shower curtain effect” Figures 16 & 17 synthesise this sensitivity analysis. The link budgets show positive margins in all cases. 9.FIRST FLIGHTA first flight was successfully performed on April 13rd to qualify the optical window. (Cf.Fig.18). During this flight the air tightness of this specific window was demonstrated up to the maximum cruise altitude of the aircraft 33.000 ft. |