PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
When a light wave passes through a sample, it undergoes a phase delay related to the optical path it has taken. The amount of shift is proportional to the product of the refractive index and the thickness of the sample and cannot be measured using conventional light microscopy. Furthermore, the velocity of light propagation in an optically anisotropic medium may depend on its polarization state. This causes a phase shift between the polarization components of the oscillating electric field called retardance. Both quantitative phase and polarimetric retardance are commonly used to examine biological tissues. This work investigates the complementarity of information retrieved by two optical modalities: Fourier Ptychographic Microscopy and Mueller Matrix Microscopy. We present two constructed microscopes and then compare the results obtained using histological slides for experimental validation.
Anastasia Bozhok,Jean Dellinger,Yoshitate Takakura,Jihad Zallat, andChristian Heinrich
"Fourier ptychographic microscopy and Mueller matrix microscopy: differences and complementarity", Proc. SPIE 11351, Unconventional Optical Imaging II, 1135122 (30 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2550964
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Anastasia Bozhok, Jean Dellinger, Yoshitate Takakura, Jihad Zallat, Christian Heinrich, "Fourier ptychographic microscopy and Mueller matrix microscopy: differences and complementarity," Proc. SPIE 11351, Unconventional Optical Imaging II, 1135122 (30 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2550964