Accurate alignment of longitudinal diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) scans of a subject is necessary to investi- gate longitudinal changes in DWI-derived diffusion measures such as fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and quantitative anisotropy (QA). Currently, studies investigating these changes in the context of repet- itive non-concussive head injuries (RHIs) perform pairwise rigid registration of all scans of a subject to the first scan or any other reference scan or template. Prajapati et.al1 show that this strategy of performing pairwise rigid registration lead to a discrepancy in the rigid transformations. To eliminate this discrepancy, they propose performing transitive inverse consistent rigid registration of the longitudinal scans, and they analyze the impact of this approach on the mean values of the local/regional estimates of these diffusion measures. In this work, we further analyze the impact of transitive inverse consistent rigid registration on the distributions (CDFs) of the local/regional estimates of diffusion measures. We identify the regions (among the 48 anatomically defined regions by the JHU DTI-based white matter atlas2,3) that show significant differences in the CDFs obtained using pairwise inverse consistent and transitive inverse consistent rigid registration by performing the two sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov(KS) hypothesis test. We find that for MD and QA, there are certain subjects that have five or more regions with significant differences in the CDFs. Further, these are the same subjects for which Prajapati et.al1 found regions with 2%-4% differences in the mean values of these diffusion measures. Thus, our results further strengthen the recommendation made by Prajapati et.al1 to employ transitive inverse consistent rigid registration when investigating local/regional longitudinal changes in diffusion measures.
|