Electronic tap hammer for composite damage assessment

Gary E. Georgeson; Scott Lea; Jeff Hansen

doi:10.1117/12.259107

14 November 1996 Electronic tap hammer for composite damage assessment

Gary E. Georgeson, Scott Lea, Jeff Hansen

Proceedings Volume 2945, Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Aircraft, Airports, and Aerospace Hardware; (1996) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.259107
Event: Nondestructive Evaluation Techniques for Aging Infrastructure and Manufacturing, 1996, Scottsdale, AZ, United States

Abstract

The percentage of composite materials used on new aircraft continues to rise, creating a greater need for NDI methods that can be used on-aircraft and are effective in identifying degradation and damage in composite structures. A particular type of degradation (delamination due to impact), can produce significant strength or stiffness reduction without being visible to the naked eye. Methods such as pulse echo ultrasonics, shearography, and thermography are being applied to this problem, but are costly to implement. The traditional coin tap or tap hammer method, is low cost, but is inherently subjective, and operator dependent. Boeing has developed a low cost instrumented tap hammer that provides a quantitative measure of the hammer/composite impulse time that can be correlated to delaminations in the structure. The instrumented tap hammer supplements the tonal discrimination of the operator with a numeric readout that can readily be related to local part quality. The effect of background noise and operator differences on the inspection results can be eliminated. An increased sensitivity is also shown over the audible tap test method. This paper describes the theoretical basis for the impulse measurement, the tap hammer design, test methods, and test results which validate the device.

Citation Download Citation

Gary E. Georgeson, Scott Lea, and Jeff Hansen "Electronic tap hammer for composite damage assessment", Proc. SPIE 2945, Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Aircraft, Airports, and Aerospace Hardware, (14 November 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.259107

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available