Paper
30 September 2004 A user’s guide of optical mounts and alignment fixtures (example from a Mersenne reflecting afocal Gregory form telescope)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Good wavefront quality, easy to align, and stable mounts are desired requirements for any optical system. Small variations in design parameters of mounts can radically diminish these qualities and performance of an optical system if tolerances of mounts don’t match optical requirements. We present design considerations required to create a stable ball knuckle mount with 5 degrees of freedom for a secondary mirror. Our system also required a rigid hub-mounted primary mirror with minimal optical deformation. Wavefront figure will be traced during design development of each mount. Overall final optical alignment was stable in 2 gravity vectors.
© (2004) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Leigh Ann Ryder, Joe B. Houston Jr., and Rich Bruner "A user’s guide of optical mounts and alignment fixtures (example from a Mersenne reflecting afocal Gregory form telescope)", Proc. SPIE 5528, Space Systems Engineering and Optical Alignment Mechanisms, (30 September 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.560511
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Mirrors

Telescopes

Optical alignment

Space telescopes

Tolerancing

Interferometers

Mirror mounts

RELATED CONTENT

Tolerance analysis versus image quality a case study for...
Proceedings of SPIE (September 30 1994)
Optimized unit telescopes for interferometric arrays
Proceedings of SPIE (February 21 2003)
Planning The National New Technology Telescope (NNTT)
Proceedings of SPIE (August 20 1986)
Some Design Aspects Of A Multiple-Mirror Telescope
Proceedings of SPIE (September 01 1972)

Back to Top