Paper
1 September 2006 Performance analysis for RX algorithm in hyperspectral remote sensing images
Hsien-Ting Chen, Hsuan Ren
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Anomaly detection for remote sensing has been intensely investigated in recent years. It is not an easy task since an anomaly has distinct unknown spectral features from its neighborhood, and it usually has small size with only a few pixels. Several methods are devoted to this problem, such as the well-known RX algorithm which takes advantage of the second-order statistics. The RX algorithm assumes Gaussian noise and uses sample covariance matrix for data whitening. However, when the anomalies pixel number exceeds certain percentage or the data is ill distributed, the sample covariance matrix can not represent the background distribution. In this case, the RX algorithm will not perform well. In this paper, we perform a computer simulation to analyze the performance of the RX algorithm under different circumstances, including the number of anomaly pixels, number of anomaly types, the distance of anomaly spectrum from background, the noise distribution, etc. Later we used AVIRIS data and utilized the characteristic of principle component analysis to estimate the covariance matrix and mean of the pixels of the background. We will analyze the performance of the RX algorithm by using the estimated covariance matrix with the original version.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Hsien-Ting Chen and Hsuan Ren "Performance analysis for RX algorithm in hyperspectral remote sensing images", Proc. SPIE 6302, Imaging Spectrometry XI, 630211 (1 September 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.682957
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Remote sensing

Computer simulations

Hyperspectral imaging

Principal component analysis

Detection and tracking algorithms

Algorithm development

Image analysis

Back to Top