|
1.INTRODUCTIONIn spite of the recent advances in automated blood analyser technologies such as flow cytometers and impedance analysers, blood smear analysis remains an indispensable technique for diagnosis of several hematological disorders.1,2 The reason is that the complete blood count (CBC) reading generated by these blood analysers is does not provide disease specific and high resolution information on individual cell morphology which needs to be obtained through a blood smear test. Blood smear tests are carried out in pathology labs by chemically staining a smear of blood on a glass slide (typically a Giemsa stain) and observing the shape and morphology of each cell under a microscope in order to aid in the diagnosis of diseases such as malaria, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and leukaemia among others. The diagnosis requires staining of the cells and relies on human investigation which provides information that is qualitative and hence subjective.3,4 Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) refers to a set of microscopy techniques where contrast in the images is generated endogenously by measuring the optical path length difference across a cell or tissue sample. This optical path length difference is proportional to the phase ϕ(x,y) of the imaging field and is given by where ncell is the refractive index of the cell, nm is the refractive index of the medium surrounding the cell, λ is wavelength of light and t(x,y) is the thickness of the cell.5-8 The refractive index difference [ncell(x,y) – nm] is related to the dry mass content of the cell and, hence, the phase of cell not only changes with its thickness but also with variations in its intracellular contents.9-14 A QPI image or phase map quantifies physical and biochemical properties of cells and provides a means for carrying out analysis that is free from the subjectivity of the investigator and lends itself to automation. White light Diffraction phase microscopy (wDPM) has been reported previously in literature as a QPI technique that is implemented as an add-on module to a commercial microscope. As an interferometric technique that is both common path and single-shot, wDPM provides a stable, repeatable imaging modality for high throughput acquisition. Using white light illumination, a wDPM system also has high spatial phase sensitivity and low speckle noise.15-17 We show here a quantitative label-free method for obtaining the optical path length image of an entire blood smear at 100x magnification by using wDPM. Using a slide scanning and mosaic stitching software platform developed in-house we are able to obtain the quantitative phase image of the entire smear at high throughput. 2.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES2.1SampleWe obtained our blood smear microscope slide sample from our collaborating pathologist Dr. Krishnarao Tangella at Presence Covenant Medical Center in Urbana, IL (IRB approved). The smear was unstained and was cover-slipped with methanol as the mounting medium. Methanol was chosen as the mounting medium instead of more conventional media such as xylene owing to its lower refractive index (n = 1.3282 at 0.550 nm), providing higher contrast in the image according to Eq. (1). 2.2Optical SetupThe optical setup for the wDPM system is illustrated in Figure 1. As shown in the figure, a diffraction grating (Edmund Optics 110 lp/mm) is placed at the conjugate image plane at the output port of a commercial microscope Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 (represented by the optical train from the light source to the tube lens). A 4f system formed by lenses L1 (f1 = 60 mm) and L2 (f2 = 150 mm) forms another conjugate image plane on the CCD camera (Andor Zyla). At the Fourier plane of lens L1 a spatial filter is placed. As illustrated, the spatial filter low pass filters the zeroth diffraction order such that only its dc component is allowed through, forming a reference plane wave at the camera plane. The first order is allowed to go through unaffected. The raw DPM image is generated by the interference of the full imaging field of the first order I1 (x, y) and the zeroth order plane wave I0 at the camera plane and is given by where q is spatial frequency shift caused by the grating in the first order. A 40x/0.75 NA bright field objective was using for imaging whereas the external optics added a further 2.5x magnification, resulting in a total magnification of 100x. The condenser aperture was closed to 0.09 NA for maximum spatial coherence and interference between the two orders. 2.3Slide scanning, stitching and phase reconstructionA slide scanning software, developed in-house in Visual C++ was used for scanning the entire sample microscope slide. The total scanning time for the entire smear area (23 mm x 26 mm, mosaic of 47970 images of 1776 x 1760 pixels each) was around 6 hours. A typical raw wDPM image generated by the system is shown in Figure 2 (a) with the fringes, formed as the result of the off-axis interference between the zeroth and first orders, clearly visible. The procedure for the reconstruction of the phase image is schematically illustrated in Figure 2. A MATLAB based code was used for this reconstruction. After reconstruction of the phase, the images for each field of view were stitched together using a stitching code written in Python. 3.RESULTSFigure 3 shows the phase image obtained using the wDPM system and slide scanning software. As shown in the figure, a large scanning area of around 6 cm2 can be efficiently imaged for a comprehensive determination of the numbers and morphologies for both red and white blood cells at high throughput. As described in previous publications from our group, the resolution of the wDPM system is diffraction limited provided that grating period satisfies the sampling criterion. Our grating was chosen bearing this in mind and the diffraction limited resolution was calculated to be approx. 0.83 μm.18 4.FUTURE WORKAs part of future efforts, we propose to develop algorithms for automatic segmentation of red and white blood cells from the phase image of the entire smear. Such segmentation will allow the determination of the total cell numbers and 2-d morphological parameters of each cell such as sphericity and projected area of each cell. Since the phase value contains information about the product of the refractive index and thickness (Eq. 1), by using published refractive index values for red and white blood cells, thicknesses of these cells may also be determined. The combination of segmentation and measurement of thickness can provide access to 3-d morphological parameters of cells that are not only indicative of cell type but can also diagnose the presence of any diseases that lead to symptomatic morphological changes in cells such as sickle cell anemia, haemolytic anemia, anisocytosis etc. Since our system has the capabilities of scanning large areas and generating their phase images as high throughput, our vision for the future is to provide a comprehensive single cell level automated morphological analysis of blood smears that addresses the shortcomings of current methods in terms of the speed and objectivity of the test. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work was supported by National Science Foundation (grants CBET-1040462 MRI), Phi Optics and Agilent Laboratories. For more information visit http://light.ece.illinois.edu/. REFERENCESBain, B. J.,
“Diagnosis from the Blood Smear,,”
New England Journal of Medicine, 353
(5), 498
–507
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra043442 Google Scholar
Peterson, P., McNeill, S. and Gulati, G., Laboratory Hematology Practice, 10
–25 Wiley-Blackwell,2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444398595 Google Scholar
Mir, M., Ding, H., Wang Z.,
“Blood screening using diffraction phase cytometry,,”
Journal of Biomedical Optics, 15
(2), 027016
–027016-4
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3369965 Google Scholar
Mir, M., Wang, Z., Tangella, K.,
“Diffraction Phase Cytometry: blood on a CD-ROM,,”
Optics Express, 17
(4), 2579
–2585
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.002579 Google Scholar
Popescu, G., Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues, McGraw Hill, New York
(2011). Google Scholar
Park, Y., Popescu, G., Badizadegan, K.,
“Diffraction phase and fluorescence microscopy,,”
Optics Express, 14
(18), 8263
–8268
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.008263 Google Scholar
Mann, C., Yu, L., Lo, C.-M.,
“High-resolution quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by digital holography,,”
Optics Express, 13
(22), 8693
–8698
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.008693 Google Scholar
Kim, M., Digital Holographic Microscopy: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, Springer, New York
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7793-9 Google Scholar
Cooper, K. L., Oh, S., Sung, Y.,
“Multiple phases of chondrocyte enlargement underlie differences in skeletal proportions,,”
Nature, 495
(7441), 375
–378
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11940 Google Scholar
Park, Y., Diez-Silva, M., Popescu, G.,
“Refractive index maps and membrane dynamics of human red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum,,”
in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
13730
–13735
(2008). Google Scholar
Park, Y., Yamauchi, T., Choi, W.,
“Spectroscopic phase microscopy for quantifying hemoglobin concentrations in intact red blood cells,,”
Optics Letters, 34
(23), 3668
–3670
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.003668 Google Scholar
Cho, S., Kim, S., Kim. Y.,
“Optical imaging techniques for the study of malaria,,”
Trends in Biotechnology, 30
(2), 71
–79
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.08.004 Google Scholar
Memmolo, P., Miccio, L., Merola, F.,
“3D morphometry of red blood cells by digital holography,,”
Cytometry Part A, 85
(12), 1030
–1036
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.v85.12 Google Scholar
Seo, S., Isikman, S. O., Sencan, I.,
“High-Throughput Lens-Free Blood Analysis on a Chip,,”
Analytical Chemistry, 82
(11), 4621
–4627
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac1007915 Google Scholar
Bhaduri, B., Pham, H., Mir, M.,
“Diffraction phase microscopy with white light,,”
Optics Letters, 37
(6), 1094
–1096
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.001094 Google Scholar
Popescu, G., Ikeda, T., Dasari, R. R.,
“Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics,,”
Optics Letters, 31
(6), 775
–777
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.000775 Google Scholar
Pham, H., Bhaduri, B., Ding, H.,
“Spectroscopic diffraction phase microscopy,,”
Optics Letters, 37
(16), 3438
–3440
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.003438 Google Scholar
Bhaduri, B., Edwards, C., Pham, H.,
“Diffraction phase microscopy: principles and applications in materials and life sciences,,”
Advances in Optics and Photonics, 6
(1), 57
–119
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.6.000057 Google Scholar
|