Open Access
26 July 2021 Electrically tunable diffuser for holographic multiplexing storage
Wen-Kai Lin, Li-Peng Chen, Shao-Kui Zhou, Tien-Shou Yeh, Wei-Chia Su
Author Affiliations +
Funded by: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST)
Abstract
A polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) device is fabricated to serve as a diffuser for random phase encoding of reference beams in holographic storage system. By tuning the applied voltage on the PDLC device, three individual random phase reference waves which are orthogonal to each other can be generated. Therefore, holographic multiplexing scheme can be performed using voltage modulation on the PDLC diffuser. In addition, shift multiplexing technique still can be performed in the storage system. When compared with conventional shift multiplexing, using electrically tunable PDLC diffuser offers additional multiplexing mechanism in the presented technique. Using the proposed PDLC diffuser, the multiplexing numbers can be enhanced three times owing to voltage modulation. A holographic storage system implemented using shift multiplexing and voltage modulation on PDLC diffuser is demonstrated.

1.

Introduction

Volume holographic storage (VHS) is considered as a potential candidate for optical data storage in the next generation owing to its high storage capacity and fast access rate.13 In recent years, several materials that can apply to VHS, such as dye-doped acrylic, photopolymer, polymer-doped liquid crystal (LC), and photorefractive crystal, have been researched well.410 Achievement of high storage capacity of VHS relies on the implementation of multiplexing techniques, such as wavelength multiplexing, angle multiplexing, shift multiplexing, and phase-code multiplexing,918 which enable storage of multiple images in the same area or volume becomes possible. Among these techniques, phase-code multiplexing is an interesting technique because it offers multiplexing storage mechanism for thin holograms without Bragg selectivity.

Multiplexing mechanism of phase coding in holographic storage is based on the property that reference waves are orthogonal to each other and therefore the crosstalk between sequent recordings is suppressed. Typically, there are two kinds of phase-code multiplexing method. One is orthogonal phase multiplexing and the other is random phase multiplexing. For orthogonal phase code multiplexing, phase encoding can be implemented with a phase spatial light modulator coded with orthogonal Walsh–Hadamard functions.14,15 For random phase-code multiplexing, a sequent of random phase encoding can be performed by shifting a diffuser device such as a ground glass. The newly generated phase code is orthogonal to the previous one and can be used as the reference wave to store the next new data. The orthogonal property of generated phase codes in this way has been proved and multiplexing storage based on the technique has been demonstrated.16,17 In addition, random phase multiplexing also has an attractive characteristic for encryption and security.1821 Random phase encoding technique also can be adopted to shift multiplexing for holographic storage.19,2225 In conventional random phase-shifting multiplexing system, the orthogonal reference wave can be generated via shifting tiny relative displacements between the diffuser and holographic material. Therefore, the system can record numerous images without crosstalk noise by shifting the holographic material.

In our presented technique, a polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) device is used to serve as the required diffuser for random phase-shifting multiplexing. The transmitted random-phase-encoded wavefront is used as the reference beam for holographic storage in this system. The random phase distribution can be modified with the applied voltage on the PDLC diffuser. With proper arrangement, once the applied voltage is tuned, the newly generated random-phase-encoded wavefront becomes orthogonal to the previous one and it is not able to retrieve the previous stored hologram in the material. With this property, at least three individual random phase reference waves that are orthogonal to each other can be generated. And accordingly, three different page images can be multiplexed recorded in the same location by tuning the applied voltage on PDLC diffuser without shifting the holographic material. Simultaneously, the voltage modulation will not affect the original random phase-shifting multiplexing storage in the system.

Accordingly, a holographic storage system is successfully implemented with the combination of voltage modulation on PDLC device and random phase-shift multiplexing storage of the holographic film. The major gist of this paper is to illustrate the PDLC diffuser’s advantage on multiplexing mechanism in holographic storage systems. When comparing with the tradition random phase-shifting multiplexing, the multiplexing numbers offered by proposed technique are enhanced three times owing to voltage modulation. In this paper, 12 data pages were stored within the holographic material at four recording stacks with random phase-shift multiplexing. And each stack contained three individual images recorded by voltage modulation on PDLC diffuser.

2.

PDLC Diffuser

PDLC devices have been widely applied in electro-optical devices and displays.2629 PDLCs usually contain approximately equal amounts of LC and polymer. As shown in Fig. 1, a cured PDLC cell consists of LC droplets embedded in a polymer matrix. The refraction index of the polymer matrix is approximately equal to the ordinary refraction index of LCs. Without applied voltage, the orientation of LCs for each droplet is randomly distributed, and the refraction index between LCs and polymer matrix is mismatched. In this state, the PDLC cell looks hazy because the incident light is scattered, and the diffuser effect is generated. In contrast, when a strong electric field is applied, the orientation of LCs in the droplets becomes parallel to the direction of the electric field if a positively anisotropic LC is employed. The PDLC cell becomes transparent for the incident light because the ordinary refraction index of LCs is approximately equal to that of the polymer matrix.

Fig. 1

(a) PDLC cell without applied voltage. (b) PDLC cell with a strong applied electric field.

OE_60_7_075105_f001.png

In this paper, PDLC diffuser is fabricated by the mixture of LC E7 (Merck) and prepolymer NOA65 (Norland) with equal amount. The mixture is injected into an empty cell fabricated with ITO glasses. After curing with UV light, the PDLC diffuser is generated. The thickness of the PDLC cell is 50  μm and its dimension is 2  cm×3  cm.

Figure 2 shows the transmittance versus applied voltage curves of the PDLC diffuser. The transmittance experiment of the PDLC diffuser is measured using a normal incident collimated laser beam with wavelength of 532 nm. The measurement system is shown in Fig. 3. The diameter of incident collimated beam is about 1 cm. The transmission light passing through the diffuser will diverge angularly, and the distribution area of the transmission wavefront will be larger than that of power detector. A power detector with receiving area of 1  cm2 is located behind the PDLC diffuser to collect the transmission power. The input electric field is a square wave AC voltage with fixed frequency of 100 Hz.

Fig. 2

The transmittance versus applied voltage curve of the PDLC device.

OE_60_7_075105_f002.png

Fig. 3

The transmittance measurement system.

OE_60_7_075105_f003.png

From Fig. 2, we can find the transmittance basically increases with the applied voltage. When the applied voltage is <65  V, the transmittance still approaches zero. The cell transmittance monotonically increases when the applied voltage is from 65 to 120 V. Although the transmittance is very low and seems to keep the same when the applied voltage is <65  V, the phase of transmission light is indeed modulated for each different applied voltages. Furthermore, within this range, the refraction index between LCs and polymer matrix is still mismatched, and phase difference between LCs and polymer matrix is still randomly distributed in the range from 0 to 2π for each applied voltage. Our purpose is to find at least two individual random phase reference waves which are orthogonal to each other within the applied voltage range from 0 to 65 V.

When the applied voltage is larger than 65 V, in the monotonically increase range, phase difference between any LCs and polymer matrix becomes smaller than 2π. The generated random phase reference wave may lack enough orthogonal property with the other one and will induce crosstalk noise for multiplexing storage. And with the increased voltage, eventual there is no phase difference between LCs and polymer matrix in the saturation state. In the saturation range, the device does not generate any effect of random phase encoding.

3.

Holographic Multiplexing

The holographic experiment system is shown in Fig. 4. A diode-pumped-solid-state laser with wavelength of 532 nm was used as the light source. The laser beam was split by beam splitter and both of them were expanded to become two collimation plane waves. Polarization states of these two waves were both s-polarized. In the arm of signal beam, an image pattern, an imaging lens, and a holographic recording material were located on the propagation path of signal beam sequentially. The incident data image was imaged on the CCD sensor. In the arm of reference beam, the collimation wave was beam-shaped to become a convergent spherical wave with a positive lens. And then the convergent spherical wave was incident on the PDLC diffuser. The illumination area of the convergent spherical wave on the PDLC diffuser was a circular shape with diameter of 15 mm. Without the diffuser, the focus spot is located behind the diffuser with distance of 2 cm. The transmitted wave was then used as the random-phase-encoded reference wave for holographic recording. The recording angle for the signal waves was about 30 deg in this system. The distance between PDLC and the holographic film is 5 cm.

Fig. 4

The holographic multiplexing system.

OE_60_7_075105_f004.png

The holographic film was set on a linear stage which was perpendicular to the reference wave. The holographic film is also one kind of polymer-contained material which was composed by 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (50.3 wt. %), trimethylolpropane triacrylate (21.6 wt. %), photoinitiator (3 wt. %), and photosensitizer (0.1 wt. %) with LC E7 (25 wt. %) sealed in a glass cell with thickness of 20  μm.

3.1.

Multiplexing Storage Based on Voltage Modulation of PDLC

In the writing process, we recorded the first image without applying any voltage on PDLC diffuser using the system as shown in Fig. 4. After recording, an electric field was applied on the PDLC device. We increased the voltage of the applied electric field and observed the diffraction of the first recorded image. We found the diffraction image will start to degrade with the increased applied voltage, and it became invisible when the applied voltage was increased to 42 V. And then we recorded the second image using the reference wave with an applied field at 42 V. When the recording of the second image was finished, we continued to increase the applied voltage on the PDLC diffuser and we found the diffraction of the second image degraded to vanish with an applied field of 52 V. Then, the third image was recorded with the applied field of 52 V. Accordingly, the applied electric field for multiplexing storage performed by voltage modulation on PDLC diffuser is selected at 0, 42, and 52 V for the following experiments.

3.2.

Multiplexing Storage Based on Shifting of Holographic Film

After the recording process described in the above section, the three images’ data have been stored in the same recording stack of the holographic film. The holographic film was shifted laterally by distance of 5  μm using a linear stage to move to the next recording stack. The voltage modulation process for the recording of the three images in the first stack was repeated to implement storage of another three images in the second recording stack. We repeated the recording process to finish the recording in the third and fourth stack. The holographic film was shifted 5  μm on each occasion before shifting to the next recording stack. As a result, each stack on the holographic film contains three individual recorded images, and their corresponding applied voltage on the PDLC device is 0, 42, and 52 V, respectively.

3.3.

Retrieved Diffraction Images

In the reading process, the stored 12 data images were retrieved sequentially as shown in Fig. 5. When holographic film is shifted back to the position of corresponding stack, we can observe the diffraction of the three recorded images in turn when the applied voltage on PDLC is 0, 42, and 52 V, respectively. From the reconstruction images, we can find there were no obvious crosstalk noises for any two adjacent voltage modulation states.

Fig. 5

The retrieved diffraction images from the holographic disk.

OE_60_7_075105_f005.png

4.

Discussions

4.1.

Shifting Selectivity

In this section, we compare the shifting selectivity of reference waves with applied voltage at 0, 42, and 50 V, respectively. In the measurements, whole system setup is similar with that in Fig. 4 except the signal beam is a modified to become a collimated wave. The relationship of diffraction power and displacement of holographic film is shown in Fig. 6. From our experimental measurement results, the horizontal shifting selectivity for these three reference waves is <3.6  μm. Nevertheless, to keep a higher signal-to-noise ration of diffraction image and avoid possible crosstalk noises, the shift distance for next adjacent stack in this practical demonstration system was set as 5  μm.

Fig. 6

Experimental results of lateral shifting selectivity for the proposed multiplexing storage system.

OE_60_7_075105_f006.png

4.2.

Orthogonal Property and Crosstalk Noises

To ensure the images recorded at 0, 42, and 52 V would not generate crosstalk noises with each other, we measured the power of diffraction signal at different readout conditions. Each hologram recorded at 0, 42, and 52 V (without voltage multiplexing storage) was individually probed by a reading wave with different applied voltage on the PDLC diffuser. The results are shown in Fig. 7. In Fig. 7(a), the diffraction signal of the hologram recorded at 0 V of course appears at maximum diffraction efficiency when the reading wave has applied voltage of 0 V. But the diffraction decreases with the increased applied voltage on the PDLC, and when the applied voltage is around 36 V, the diffraction power approaches zero. The result seems that the voltage modulation with 36 V is enough to generate a new orthogonal phase wave. However, in our practical visual observation, the diffraction image will completely disappear when the applied voltage is 42 V. In Fig. 7(b), the diffraction signal of hologram recorded at 42 V has a strong diffraction when the reading wave with applied voltage of 42 V. Its diffraction disappears when the applied voltage is 0 V. The results show these two random-phase reference waves with applied field of 0 and 42 V are orthogonal to each other, and therefore holograms recorded at these two states will not generate crosstalk noises. Nevertheless, when applied field is larger than 60 V, diffraction power can be observed and measured. It means reference waves with an applied field larger than 60 V will induce self-crosstalk noises for the hologram recorded at 42 V. We estimate when the applied field reaches 42 V, the composition of the transmitted plane wave actually already contains partial plane wave. When the applied field is larger than 60 V, the proportion of plane wave in the newly generated reference wave will increase, and therefore it induces self-crosstalk noises for the hologram recorded at 42 V.

Fig. 7

The diffraction efficiency of recorded hologram probed by a reading beam with different applied voltages on PDLC device.

OE_60_7_075105_f007.png

In Fig. 7(c), we can find the diffraction signal of hologram recorded at 52 V will not generate crosstalk noises for the hologram recorded at 0 and 42 V, respectively. However, when the applied field is larger than 60 V, self-crosstalk noises arise again for the hologram recorded at 52 V. Noticeably, when the applied field is larger than 74 V, the diffraction power of self-crosstalk noise will be larger than the signal recorded at 52 V. The reason is that the induced self-crosstalk noises will be amplified when the hologram is probed with the strong applied electric field from the PDLC. In this condition, the reference beam has almost become a transmitted plane wave, and its power becomes much larger than the transmitted random-phase-encoded reference wave, which spreads divergently. And accordingly the induced self-crosstalk noises will be amplified and becomes larger than the signal.

Accordingly, we conclude that there are three random phase reference waves that are orthogonal to each other can be generated in our device. With the applied voltages of 0, 42, and 52 V on the PDLC diffuser, the generated random phase reference waves can be used for multiplexing storage. When the applied field is larger than 60 V, the newly generated reference wave will lack enough orthogonal property with the reference wave with applied voltages of 42 and 52 V.

5.

Conclusion

Based on the random phase waves generated by a PDLC diffuser and its electrically tunable property, a PDLC device is used successfully to implement a holographic multiplexing system. The presented multiplexing scheme is operated with combination of voltage modulation on PDLC device and random phase-shift multiplexing technique. Based on the random phase-shifting multiplexing system, we illustrate the voltage modulation method that can record additional images without any displacement of the holographic material. By tuning the applied voltage on the PDLC device, three individual random phase reference waves that are orthogonal to each other can be generated. Based on the mechanism, three different page images can be stored using voltage modulation on the PDLC device. The additional multiplexing ability is not able to be found from a conventional diffuser such as ground glass owing to the lack of an electrically tunable property. In the demonstrated system, 12 data pages were stored within the holographic material at four recording stacks with shift multiplexing, and three individual images were stored in each individual stack with voltage modulation on the PDLC diffuser.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Contract No. MOST 108-2221-E-018-018-MY3. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. 

G. W. Burr et al., “Volume holographic data-storage at areal density of 250-gigapixels/in.2,” Opt. Lett., 26 444 –446 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.000444 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

2. 

K. Anderson and K. Curtis, “Polytopic multiplexing,” Opt. Lett., 29 1402 –1404 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.001402 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

3. 

S. S. Orlov et al., “High-transfer-rate high-capacity holographic diskdata-storage system,” Appl. Opt., 43 4902 –4914 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.004902 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

4. 

V. P. Pham et al., “Real-time dynamic polarization holographic recording on auto-erasable azo-dye doped PMMA storage media,” Opt. Mater., 4 467 –475 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-3467(94)00122-7 OMATET 0925-3467 Google Scholar

5. 

V. P. Pham et al., “Novel azo dye-doped poly (methyl methacrylate) films as optical data storage media,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 36 429 –438 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.36.429 Google Scholar

6. 

I. G. Naydenova et al., “Holographic recording in nanoparticle-doped photopolymer,” Proc. SPIE, 6252 625206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.676503 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

7. 

M. S. Mahmud et al., “Holographic recording in acrylamide photopolymers: thickness limitations,” Appl. Opt., 48 2642 –2648 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.002642 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

8. 

M.-S. Weiser et al., “Self-processing, diffusion-based photopolymers for holographic applications,” Macromol. Symp., 296 133 –137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201051020 MSYMEC 1022-1360 Google Scholar

9. 

S. Massenot et al., “Multiplexed holographic transmission gratings recorded in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystals: static and dynamic studies,” Appl. Opt., 44 5273 –5280 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.005273 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

10. 

F. T. S. Yu et al., “Wavelength multiplexed reflection matched spatial filters using LiNbO3,” Opt. Commun., 81 343 –347 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(91)90595-5 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

11. 

W. C. Su and C. M. Chen, “Angular selectivity in volume holograms with spherical reference waves implemented by rotating a mirror,” Opt. Eng., 46 015802 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2430504 Google Scholar

12. 

G. J. Steckman, A. Pu and D. Psaltis, “Storage density of shift-multiplexed holographic memory,” Appl. Opt., 40 3387 –3394 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.003387 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

13. 

C. C. Sun and W. C. Su, “Three-dimensional shifting selectivity of random phase encoding in volume holograms,” Appl. Opt., 40 1253 –1260 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.001253 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

14. 

C. Denz, G. Pauliat and G. Roosen, “Volume hologram multiplexing using a deterministic phase encoding method,” Opt. Commun., 85 171 –176 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(91)90389-U OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

15. 

C. Alves, G. Pauliat and G. Roosen, “Dynamic phase-encoding storage of 64 images in a BaTiO3 photorefractive crystal,” Opt. Lett., 19 1894 –1896 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.19.001894 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

16. 

C. C. Sun et al., “Random phase-coded multiplexing in LiNbO3 for volume hologram storage by using a ground-glass,” Opt. Quantum Electron., 28 1551 –1561 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326225 OQELDI 0306-8919 Google Scholar

17. 

J. T. LaMacchia and D. L. White, “Coded multiple exposure holograms,” Appl. Opt., 7 91 –94 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.7.000091 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

18. 

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw and L. Hesselink, “Encrypted holographic data storage based on orthogonal-phase-code multiplexing,” Appl. Opt., 34 6012 –6015 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.006012 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

19. 

W. C. Su et al., “Security optical data storage in Fourier holograms,” Appl. Opt., 51 1297 –1303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.001297 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

20. 

W. C. Su, C. C. SunW. C. Su, “Selective-encrypted holographic storage in LiNbO3 with angular multiplexing,” Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett., 42 227 –230 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.20260 MOTLEO 0895-2477 Google Scholar

21. 

C. Denz et al., “Digital volume holographic data storage using phase-coded multiplexing,” Proc. SPIE, 3802 142 –147 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.370226 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

22. 

T. Nobukawa, Y. Wani and T. Nomura, “Multiplexed recording with uncorrelated computer-generated reference patterns in coaxial holographic data storage,” Opt. Lett., 40 2161 –2164 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.002161 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

23. 

T. Nishizaki, O. Matoba and K. Nitta, “Available number of multiplexed holograms based on signal-to-noise ratio analysis in reflection-type holographic memory using three-dimensional speckle-shift multiplexing,” Appl. Opt., 53 5733 –5739 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.005733 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

24. 

T. Shimura et al., “Analysis of a collinear holographic storage system: introduction of pixel spread function,” Opt. Lett., 31 1208 –1210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.001208 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

25. 

X. H. Lee et al., “Random phase encoding in holographic optical storage with energy-effective phase modulation by a phase plate of micro-lens array,” Opt. Commun., 287 40 –44 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2012.08.076 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

26. 

O. Matoba et al., “Three-dimensional/two-dimensional convertible display based on computer-generated holograms and an amplitude-modulated spatial light modulator,” Opt. Eng., 57 061614 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.57.6.061614 Google Scholar

27. 

M. Jamil et al., “Nanoparticle-doped polymer-dispersed liquid crystal display,” Curr. Sci., 101 1544 –1552 (2011). CUSCAM 0011-3891 Google Scholar

28. 

H. L. Zhang et al., “Integral imaging-based 2D/3D convertible display system by using holographic optical element and polymer dispersed liquid crystal,” Opt. Lett., 44 387 –390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.000387 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

29. 

C. T. Hsieh et al., “Polarization-independent distortion corrector fabricated using polymer-dispersed liquid crystals,” Appl. Opt., 53 (3), 383 –387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.000383 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

Biography

Wen-Kai Lin received his BS degree from the Department of Applied Physics, National Pingtung University, Taiwan, in 2013, and his MS degree from the Department of Physics, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan, in 2015. Currently, he is a PhD student at the College of Photonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan. His interests are in optical holography, computer-generated holograms, and optical design.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Wen-Kai Lin, Li-Peng Chen, Shao-Kui Zhou, Tien-Shou Yeh, and Wei-Chia Su "Electrically tunable diffuser for holographic multiplexing storage," Optical Engineering 60(7), 075105 (26 July 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.60.7.075105
Received: 28 April 2021; Accepted: 9 July 2021; Published: 26 July 2021
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Multiplexing

Diffusers

Holography

Diffraction

Modulation

Holograms

Polymers

Back to Top