|
Bioactive surfaces are synthetically engineered surfaces capable of biological interactions with a myriad of biomolecules.1 These surfaces have demonstrated the efficient capture and attachment of biomolecules, enabling applications like filtration,2 the directing of cell growth and movement,3 as well as improving the biocompatibility of implantable materials.4 Another notable application is surface-specific optical biosensing which exploits the biorecognition capability of the bioactive layer.5 It involves the coating of optical waveguide surfaces with desired bioactive elements for light–matter interactions localized to several hundred nanometers from its surface.6 Among the various optical waveguides, optical fibers clearly stand out with the advantages of miniaturization, long interaction lengths, and easy integration within systems.7 The conventional immobilization of bioactive layers on their outer surfaces, however, entails the incorporation of supplementary flow cells for sample introduction, overshadowing the miniaturization offered by optical fibers. On the contrary, microchannel-like air hole structures in microstructured optical fibers and photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) offer intrinsically self-contained systems. Although there have been successful demonstrations of coating the bioactive layer on their air hole surfaces, they were typically achieved via covalent or electrostatic layer-by-layer attachments.8 The former required the separate activation of both the surface and bioactive element, whereas the latter involved an elaborate successive layering process. Additionally, both methods employ harsh chemicals during the coating process. Laser-assisted protein adsorption by photobleaching (LAPAP)—a facile photo-immobilization of biomolecules (fluorophore-conjugated) on substrates (albumin-passivated)—presents itself as an attractive substitute. In brief, the method involves the photobleaching of fluorophores, leading to their radicalization and consequent binding to albumin.9 The immobilization process does not require any preactivation reactions, laborious procedures, or the use of toxic chemicals. Moreover, there have been recent demonstrations of using PCFs for photochemical reactions10,11 alluding to the feasibility of an in-fiber light-induced immobilization method. The added fact that the fluorophores to be photobleached have been shown to be easily conjugated to a wide range of nanoparticles and biomolecules, such as biotin, marked the versatility of this immobilization technique. Biotin is of particular interest as it is used extensively in biological studies due to its specificity and binding affinity with streptavidin and other avidin-like molecules.12 The ease of conjugating biotin or streptavidin with fluorophores, phospholipids, antibodies and antigens, nanoparticles, enzymes, and genetic sequences13 has led to a myriad of biomolecular applications. In addition, streptavidin has four binding sites to bind biotinylated molecules, further facilitating the formation of biomolecular assemblies or multiplexes for bioanalytical detection and separation. We report the first experimental demonstration of an in-fiber light-induced bioactive coating using an LED light source. This process is further qualified by the subsequent optical detection of biotin-bound dye-conjugated streptavidin. We show that the method is simple yet effective in functionalizing in-fiber surfaces. The PCF used was a defected-core PCF14 manufactured by Yangtze Optical Fibre & Cable Company Ltd. Each PCF was cleaved to a length of 105 mm and inserted into the optofluidic platform [described in our earlier work (Ref. 15)] at a bending radius of 12.5 mm, as shown in Fig. 1. Photo-immobilization within the aforementioned PCF was done via an adaptation of the LAPAP protocol. First, the PCF air holes were passivated with a base layer of bovine serum albumin (BSA) through a continuous infiltration with 0.5% BSA solution for 45 min, achieved with the aid of a modified syringe pump. Photo-immobilization was subsequently attained via a 10 min in-fiber excitation of infiltrated biotin-4-fluorescein (B4F) solution, facilitated by the earlier mentioned optofluidic platform. A 10-min duration was chosen as no significant spectral changes were observed beyond that. The excitation source employed was a 2.3 mW, 490 nm fiber-coupled LED (Thorlabs M490F1), matching the absorption of B4F. Prolonged illumination of the fluorescein component in B4F hence led to its photobleaching, which resulted in the formation of BSA-binding radicals. The consequential photo-immobilized B4F, forming the bioactive surface as depicted in Fig. 2, was qualified with the use of a dye-conjugated streptavidin—Atto488-conjugated streptavidin (Atto488Strep) with a concentration of —that was allowed to incubate for 5 min upon infiltration. It should be noted that after each layer, the PCF was flushed with distilled ultra-filtrated water to remove excess reagents and its corresponding output spectrum was recorded with an Ocean Optics Maya2000 spectrometer using the same LED excitation. To ensure repeatability and to mitigate intensity fluctuations when comparing triplicates, a dimensionless ratiometric relationship between the intensities at Atto488’s peak emission and absorption wavelengths was used.16 Triplicates were obtained with the ratio between the intensities at and [] recorded in Table 1. Figure 3 shows the collected output spectra, normalized to their respective peak intensities. Upon Atto488Strep binding (BSA-pbB4F-Atto488Strep), a significant dip and hump was observed around the 500 and 523 nm regions, respectively, as shown in Fig. 3. These corresponded to Atto488’s peak absorption and emission17 and thus were indicative of the presence of biotin-bound Atto488Strep, implying a successful photo-immobilization of B4F. Table 1Ratio between the intensities at λems=523 nm and λabs=500 nm [I(λems)/I(λabs))] for different photonic crystal fibers (PCF) coatings. The mean value and standard deviation are shown.
Another repetition made without photobleaching the B4F, by essentially incubating the B4F for the same amount of time without illumination, exhibited residual amounts of Atto488 absorption and emission. However, it should be noted that this corresponded to the presence of only minute quantities of biotin-bound Atto488Strep. This could be attributed to small amounts of photobleaching due to the LED exposure during measurements and ambient light; and/or the nonspecific binding of Atto488Strep directly on the PCF inner surface. To assess the contribution from the nonspecific binding, a repetition of the process excluding B4F altogether with no incubation of Atto488Strep was done. It showed that any introduction of Atto488Strep caused the spectrum to deviate from the BSA only plot as shown from the ratios obtained in Table 1. However, this corresponded with only a diminutive presence of Atto488Strep which further substantiated the successful photo-immobilization of B4F above. To further eliminate spectral contributions due to BSA or pbB4F, plots representing the BSA only layer and the subsequent layer of pbB4F (BSA-pbB4F) were likewise acquired as shown in Fig. 3 (inset). As expected, the UV-absorbing BSA coat did not present any fluorescence emission. Likewise, the subsequent photo-immobilization of B4F did not contribute to the distinct dip and hump observed in the BSA-pbB4F-Atto488Strep plot. The relatively Gaussian-like pbB4F spectrum points to the absence of fluorescing B4F, which absorbs at and emits at . These observations further corroborate that the BSA-pbB4F-Atto488Strep spectrum seen is certainly due to the presence of biotin-bound Atto488Strep. It was observed that the ratios obtained could be categorized into three distinct groups: (1) definite presence of Atto488 (BSA-pbB4F-Atto488Strep); (2) minute presence of Atto488 (w/o photobleaching); and (3) no presence of Atto488 (BSA, BSA-pbB4F, and w/o B4F). These ratios give an indication of the concentration of Atto488, correlating with the extent of biotin photo-immobilization for the plots in Fig. 3 and further exemplifying that all three spectra were distinct from each other. In summary, we demonstrated an in-fiber bioactive biotin-functionalization via an adaptation of the LAPAP protocol. The consequent detection of biotin-bound Atto488Strep alluded to the successful photo-immobilization of B4F. The biotin bioactive layer would serve as a foundation for the subsequent construction of biomolecular assemblies or multiplexes in-fiber. In addition to conventional applications such as bioanalytical detection and separation, in-fiber light guidance opens up new avenues for photochemistry and catalysis using these constructs. To sum it up, this simple method for in-fiber photo-immobilization of a bioactive surface without the use of toxic reagents would offer great convenience and compactness for potential biomedical applications. AcknowledgmentsWe wish to acknowledge the funding for this project from Nanyang Technological University under the Undergraduate Research Experience on Campus (URECA) program and A*STAR SERC Advanced Optics Engineering TSRP under grant 1223600011. ReferencesE. Wischerhoffet al.,
“Smart bioactive surfaces,”
Soft Matter, 6
(4), 705
–713
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b913594d 1744-683X Google Scholar
E. Erhanet al.,
“Removal of phenol from water by membrane-immobilized enzymes: Part I. Dead-end filtration,”
J. Membrane Sci., 206
(1), 361
–373
(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00779-7 JMESDO 0376-7388 Google Scholar
L. Henchet al.,
“Bioactive materials to control cell cycle,”
Mater. Res. Innovations, 3
(6), 313
–323
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100190000055 MRINFV 1432-8917 Google Scholar
J. R. Jones,
“Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids,”
Acta Biomater., 9
(1), 4457
–4486
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ABCICB 1742-7061 Google Scholar
X. Fanet al.,
“Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: a review,”
Anal. Chim. Acta, 620
(1–2), 8
–26
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.05.022 ACACAM 0003-2670 Google Scholar
D. Ericksonet al.,
“Nanobiosensors: optofluidic, electrical and mechanical approaches to biomolecular detection at the nanoscale,”
Microfluid. Nanofluid., 4
(1–2), 33
–52
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-007-0198-8 1613-4982 Google Scholar
X.-D. WangO. S. Wolfbeis,
“Fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors (2008–2012),”
Anal. Chem., 85
(2), 487
–508
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac303159b ANCHAM 0003-2700 Google Scholar
T. M. Monroet al.,
“Sensing with suspended-core optical fibers,”
Opt. Fiber Technol., 16
(6), 343
–356
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2010.09.010 1068-5200 Google Scholar
J. M. Belisleet al.,
“Patterning protein concentration using laser-assisted adsorption by photobleaching, LAPAP,”
Lab Chip, 8
(12), 2164
–2167
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b813897d LCAHAM 1473-0197 Google Scholar
J. S. Chenet al.,
“Photochemistry in photonic crystal fiber nanoreactors,”
Chem. A Eur. J., 16
(19), 5607
–5612
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201000496 CPCHFT 1439-4235 Google Scholar
M. Schmidtet al.,
“Chemical and (photo)-catalytical transformations in photonic crystal fibers,”
ChemCatChem, 5
(3), 641
–650
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200676 CHEMK3 1867-3880 Google Scholar
M. WilchekE. A. BayerO. Livnah,
“Essentials of biorecognition: the (strept) avidin–biotin system as a model for protein–protein and protein-ligand interaction,”
Immunol. Lett., 103
(1), 27
–32
(2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2005.10.022 IMLED6 0165-2478 Google Scholar
“Avidin-Biotin Interactions: Methods and Applications,”
Methods in Molecular Biology, Springer(2008). Google Scholar
X. Yuet al.,
“Evanescent field absorption sensor using a pure-silica defected-core photonic crystal fiber,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 20
(5), 336
–338
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2007.915659 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar
D. Yonget al.,
“A compact opto-fluidic platform for chemical sensing with photonic crystal fibers,”
Sensors Actuators A, 191
(0), 22
–26
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.11.026 SAAPEB 0924-4247 Google Scholar
D. Yonget al.,
“In-fiber fluorospectroscopy based on a spectral decomposition method,”
Opt. Express, 22
(19), 23640
–23651
(2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.023640 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
G. T. Dempseyet al.,
“Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging,”
Nat. Methods, 8
(12), 1027
–1036
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1768 1548-7091 Google Scholar
|