Proceedings Article | 1 April 2024
KEYWORDS: Image quality, Reconstruction algorithms, Computed tomography, Lung, Diagnostics, Image sharpness, CT reconstruction, Medical image reconstruction, Deep learning, Tunable filters
Deep learning CT reconstruction (DLR) has become increasingly popular as a method for improving image quality and reducing radiation exposure. Due to their nonlinear nature, these algorithms result in resolution and noise performance which are object-dependent. Therefore, traditional CT phantoms, which lack realistic tissue morphology, have become inadequate for assessing clinical imaging performance. We propose to utilize 3D-printed PixelPrint phantoms, which exhibit lifelike attenuation profiles, textures, and structures, as a better tool for evaluating DLR performance. In this study, we evaluate a DLR algorithm (Precise Image (PI), Philips Healthcare) using a custom PixelPrint lung phantom and perform head-to-head comparisons between DLR, iterative reconstruction, and filtered back projection (FBP) with scans acquired at a broad range of radiation exposures (CTDIvol: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 19, and 20mGy). We compared the performance of each resultant image using noise, peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), feature-based similarity index (FSIM), information theoretic-based statistic similarity measure (ISSM) and universal image quality index (UIQ). Iterative reconstruction at 9mGy matches the image quality of FBP at 12mGy (diagnostic reference level) for all metrics, demonstrating a dose reduction capability of 25%. Meanwhile, DLR matches the image quality of diagnostic reference level FBP images at doses between 4 to 9mGy, demonstrating dose reduction capabilities between 25% and 67%. This study shows that DLR allows for reduced radiation dose compared to both FBP and iterative reconstruction without compromising image quality. Furthermore, PixelPrint phantoms offer more realistic testing conditions compared to traditional phantoms in the evaluation of novel CT technologies. This, in turn, promotes the translation of new technologies, such as DLR, into clinical practice.
