KEYWORDS: Algorithm development, Data storage, Data modeling, Detection and tracking algorithms, Computing systems, Machine learning, Data acquisition, Artificial intelligence
Any program tasked with the evaluation and acquisition of algorithms for use in deployed scenarios must have an impartial, repeatable, and auditable means of benchmarking both candidate and fielded algorithms. Success in this endeavor requires a body of representative sensor data, data labels indicating the proper algorithmic response to the data as adjudicated by subject matter experts, a means of executing algorithms under review against the data, and the ability to automatically score and report algorithm performance. Each of these capabilities should be constructed in support of program and mission goals. By curating and maintaining data, labels, tests, and scoring methodology, a program can understand and continually improve the relationship between benchmarked and fielded performance of acquired algorithms. A system supporting these program needs, deployed in an environment with sufficient computational power and necessary security controls is a powerful tool for ensuring due diligence in evaluation and acquisition of mission critical algorithms. This paper describes the Seascape system and its place in such a process.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.